WWE Lost $500 Million in Value Since News of Vince McMahon Probe

Audiences could love this storyline, however WWE’s many sponsors do not want the optics of a robust man allegedly mistreating feminine staff.

It was all good only a week in the past. Last Wednesday, pro-wrestling big WWE had a market cap simply above $5 billion. Since then, when information got here out about its board investigating longtime Chairman and CEO Vince McMahon paying tens of millions of {dollars} in hush cash to an ex-employee with whom he allegedly had an affair, WWE has misplaced $500 million in valuation. At this writing, shares within the publicly traded WWE have been down 10 p.c within the final week.

Not all of WWE’s key metrics are in decline. On the flip aspect are the corporate’s TV rankings: Both Friday’s “SmackDown” (which aired dwell mere hours after McMahon introduced he would step apart whereas the board investigates the matter) and Monday’s “Raw” jumped in viewership, in keeping with Nielsen.

This creates a curious level of rigidity: WWE followers love McMahon. They would possibly even love him a little bit further for his creation of a rubbernecking trainwreck. However, as a lot because the WWE board values that viewers (aka the rankings they supply), they worth their stockholders much more.

Both episodes of WWE’s weekly flagship wrestling reveals featured transient televised appearances by McMahon. Friday’s look, through which  McMahon plugged his unity-centric tagline for WWE, was beforehand introduced; Monday’s meme-creating second was not.

Friday’s “SmackDown” episode on the Fox broadcast community additionally featured the shock return of wrestling famous person Brock Lesnar for (one more) match with the corporate’s unified males’s champion Roman Reigns — this one for July 30’s SummerSlam. That episode earned 2.290 million complete viewers, with 750,000 of these aged 18-49. Those numbers have been up 20 p.c and 32 p.c, respectively, from the prior week, reaching their highest factors for the reason that April 1 pre-WrestleMania episode.

On June 20, USA Network’s “Raw” (which is three hours vs. “SmackDown’s” two) posted 1.986 million complete viewers; 711,000 got here from the important thing demo. Those tallies have been up 17 p.c and 27 p.c, respectively, vs. the earlier Monday and have been the present’s finest since April 4’s post-WrestleMania “Raw.”

WrestleMania is the highest occasion in all {of professional} wrestling. It is taken into account the game’s Super Bowl. The bookending episodes of “SmackDown” and “Raw” usually peak in rankings at the moment of yr.

In January 2021, WWE Network accepted a billion-dollar deal to stream its content material on NBCUniversal’s Peacock. In June 2018, Fox paid the same quantity for “SmackDown” rights. Both agreements span 5 years (“SmackDown” didn’t transfer from its former USA house to Fox till October 2019). At the time, WWE and NBCU prolonged their current USA Network deal for “Raw” for, you guessed it, 5 years.

Brock Lesnar and Roman Reigns come face to face on "SmackDown."

Brock Lesnar and Roman Reigns come nose to nose on “SmackDown.”


There is large cash at stake right here. And whereas loyal skilled wrestling followers could love the drama (a lot of it personally scripted by McMahon over the many years), WWE’s board of administrators needs nothing to do with such a scandal. Its fiduciary responsibility to ship worth for shareholders goes far past beating “Blue Bloods” in the important thing rankings demo every Friday and its company accountability goes even additional.

Mainstream tv executives and WWE’s many sponsors don’t want the potential headache from a accomplice, particularly one with the particular optics of a robust man doubtlessly mistreating feminine staff. The entire factor seems like a foul storyline from WWE’s so-called Attitude Era, when intercourse was a key component to the wrestling league’s televised presentation and McMahon, who performed a villain on TV, was a central determine in a (actual life) steroid trial.

WWE moved on from profane programming to be able to promote merchandise to households and to promote promoting time to Snickers (for instance). But McMahon’s defiant TV appearances this previous week have spoken volumes to some critics about simply how significantly the accusations are being taken on the government suites of WWE’s Stamford, Connecticut headquarters. To hijack a standard WWE Universe live-event chant, “This is not awesome.”

The 76-year-old McMahon bought the corporate from his father in 1982 and owns 80 p.c of WWE’s voting shares. His 45-year-old daughter Stephanie McMahon, the corporate’s chief model officer who introduced a go away of absence the month after the hush-money probe started (however earlier than the information of the investigation turned public), has stepped in as interim chairwoman and interim CEO.

Stephanie had stated her go away of absence was “to focus on my family.” Her husband, former champion wrestler, Paul “Triple H” Levesque, suffered a cardiac occasion within the fall. He underwent profitable coronary heart surgical procedure. Levesque can be a prime WWE government; he, Stephanie McMahon, and Vince McMahon are all members of WWE’s 12-person board.

Asuka takes on Becky Lynch on "Raw."

Asuka takes on Becky Lynch on “Raw.”


On Friday, WWE and its board of administrators introduced {that a} particular committee is investigating “alleged misconduct” by Vince McMahon and WWE’s head of expertise relations John Laurinaitis. Though McMahon has stepped again from his government roles, he continues to supervise the corporate’s inventive.

“WWE and its board of directors take all allegations of misconduct very seriously. The independent directors of the board engaged independent legal counsel to assist them with an independent review. In addition, the special committee and WWE will work with an independent third-party to conduct a comprehensive review of the company’s compliance program, HR function and overall culture,” the board stated in an announcement. “The company and the board do not expect to have further comment until the investigation is concluded.”

“I love this company and am committed to working with the independent directors to strengthen our culture and our company; it is extremely important to me that we have a safe and collaborative workplace,” Stephanie McMahon stated final week. “I have committed to doing everything in my power to help the special committee complete its work, including marshaling the cooperation of the entire company to assist in the completion of the investigation and to implement its findings.”

“I have pledged my complete cooperation to the investigation by the special committee, and I will do everything possible to support the investigation,” Vince McMahon said. “I have also pledged to accept the findings and outcome of the investigation, whatever they are.”

Vince McMahon’s internet value is estimated by Forbes at $2.3 billion. In 2021 he made $5.051 million as a WWE government, in keeping with a submitting with the SEC. Of that sum, $1.4 million was wage; the rest was a money bonus and the valuation of inventory awards. McMahon’s 2022 wage is ready at $2 million.

The information of the WWE investigation was first reported by the Wall Street Journal. In addition to uncovering the $3 million payoff to a former WWE paralegal and her signed NDA, the Journal says the WWE board has additionally found “other, older nondisclosure agreements involving claims by former female WWE employees of misconduct by Mr. McMahon and one of his top executives, John Laurinaitis.”

There are a number of claims towards each males and crossover within the case of the previous WWE paralegal. Hired in 2019, the previous worker was moved from the WWE authorized division in 2021 to grow to be Laurinaitis’ assistant. The board discovered of the $3 million payoff “in a series of anonymous emails they received from someone who said the former WWE paralegal was a friend,” in keeping with the Wall Street Journal. One e mail stated the paralegal was given to Laurinaitis “like a toy.”

“The former employee, 41 years old, had fallen on hard times before joining the company and spoke of needing extra money,” the newspaper wrote. “She said she had a law degree but had never taken the bar exam, telling colleagues that her career got sidetracked while she tended to a sick parent.”

Sign Up: Stay on prime of the most recent breaking movie and TV information! Sign up for our Email Newsletters right here.

Leave a Comment