Must Netflix be allowed to film throughout the courtroom?

The murder trial of former Bafana Bafana captain Senzo Meyiwa resumed on the Pretoria Extreme Court docket docket on Monday 30 May, nevertheless the trial was delayed for Select Tshifhiwa Maumela to problem his decision on whether or not or not Ten10 must be allowed Motion pictures film throughout the courtroom or not.


The Pretoria Extreme Court docket docket has heard that some witnesses in Senzo Meyiwa’s trial have allegedly been uncovered to harassment and intimidation after the Netflix docuseries aired. Senzo: Murder of a Soccer Star. Ten10 Motion pictures is the manufacturing agency behind the documentary.

Due to this fact the dilemma of whether or not or not Ten10 Motion pictures must be allowed to film throughout the courtroom. It was moreover well-known that the documentary premiered on April 7, merely 4 days earlier toe the trial began. This was moreover cited as a precedence throughout the courtroom.

The approved advisor of Ten10 films, Advocate Ben Winks, acknowledged that his client obtained the permission of the Registrar. Howonce, the lawyer Malesela Teffo, who represents 4 of the 5 defendants, acknowledged that there is a distinction between a media dwelling and a producing dwelling.

This prompted Maumela to delay the trial to find out whether or not or not the Ten10 films can maintain throughout the courtroom or not. The determine concluded that he cannot order the Ten10 films to vacate the courtroom. He went on to say that he’s not going to order anyone who has requested to be present throughout the courtroom to go away the room.

ALSO READ: Senzo Meyiwa murder trial: the entire twists and turns you may need to know


Netflix’s well-liked docuseries made tongues wag on Twitter as soon as they aired. The fifth and supreme episode of the documentary assortment focused on the 5 hit males accused of murdering Senzo. The documentary claims that defendant amount two, Bongani Sandiso Ntanzi, “snitched” on the alternative three defendants.

Sinqobile Maphisa, the sister of defendant amount 4, Mthokoziseni Ziphozonke Maphisa, talked about she would not take into account her brother killed Senzo.

Inside the documentary, Senzo’s brother, Sfiso Meyiwa, seems to think about him. Defendant amount 4 moreover claimed that defendant amount two was paid R3 million to frame the alternative three defendants in courtroom docket.

“Now we’re getting used as scapegoats,” Maphisa talked about.

ALSO READ: Longwe Twala accused of killing Senzo? Why this idea can add


The moral question raised in courtroom docket proper now (May 30) is whether or not or not manufacturing firms must film for income in courtroom docket. Authorized skilled Winks defended his client stating that White carda weekly newscast was allowed to film throughout the courtroom for the Oscar Pistorius trial.

He acknowledged that documentary producers are media houses. So, he feels that his client must be able to maintain.

“Documentaries are media houses. My client would not perception the blanket permission of various media houses. My client submitted an utility to the Registrar and it was authorised,” talked about Advocate Winks.

Authorized skilled Teffo argued that Ten10 Motion pictures was present in courtroom docket for the advantage of their agency and by no means for most people curiosity. Howonce, this may apply to a different media houses that film and take images in a courtroom as they are often categorised as for-profit organisations.

very good

Leave a Comment